Foss.my

i am @foss.my at the moment..

kinda interesting and lot of new thing that i don’t know ..

Get Free Email Updates!

Signup now and receive an email once I publish new content.

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Like

Related Post

8 Responses

  1. HawkEYE says:

    uploaded the google gadget for linux(CentOS 5.2) binary only to

    http://my.namran.net/repository/gg-binary.tgz

    Reply
  2. HawkEYE says:

    uploaded the google gadget for linux(CentOS 5.2) binary only to

    http://my.namran.net/repository/gg-binary.tgz

    Reply
  3. HawkEYE says:

    for ease of use .. add a launcher at desktop
    with this parameter at command box.

    /usr/local/bin/ggl-gtk >/dev/null > 2&1

    select the icon .. and fill in the description..

    done.

    click and google gadget will appear.

    Reply
  4. HawkEYE says:

    for ease of use .. add a launcher at desktop
    with this parameter at command box.

    /usr/local/bin/ggl-gtk >/dev/null > 2&1

    select the icon .. and fill in the description..

    done.

    click and google gadget will appear.

    Reply
  5. shibu073 says:

    using the gg-binary tar file .I am not able to install google gadgets in centos 5.2. when i run the command “ggl-gtk “it gives error as

    Not a regular file: /
    ggl-gtk: symbol lookup error: ggl-gtk: undefined symbol: _ZN7ggadget7SideBar26ConnectOnGoogleIconClickedEPNS_5Slot0IvEE
    You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root

    Reply
  6. shibu073 says:

    using the gg-binary tar file .I am not able to install google gadgets in centos 5.2. when i run the command “ggl-gtk “it gives error as

    Not a regular file: /
    ggl-gtk: symbol lookup error: ggl-gtk: undefined symbol: _ZN7ggadget7SideBar26ConnectOnGoogleIconClickedEPNS_5Slot0IvEE
    You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/root

    Reply
  7. HawkEYE says:

    i think it is because the different version of the underneath library ..
    as per
    http://code.google.com/p/google-gadgets-for-linux/issues/detail?id=266

    better rebuild the package from the source again following above instruction..

    binary tend to be useless anyway.. ;-(

    Reply
  8. HawkEYE says:

    i think it is because the different version of the underneath library ..
    as per
    http://code.google.com/p/google-gadgets-for-linux/issues/detail?id=266

    better rebuild the package from the source again following above instruction..

    binary tend to be useless anyway.. ;-(

    Reply

Anything to add?

X